Legal Opinion

State v. Ulis

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1992No. Nos. 92-281 and 92-526PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

The single issue presented in this case is whether appellant could assert his motion to suppress at a pretrial stage. For the reasons that follow, we answer such query in the affirmative.

Both parties to this action have asserted that the court of appeals’ interpretation of the motion to suppress in this case was too narrow. Crim.R. 12(B) provides, with respect to pretrial motions to suppress, that:

“Any defense, objection, or request which is capable of determination without the trial of the general issue may be raised before trial by motion. The following must be raised before trial:
“(3)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. GrubbOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. City of Defiance v. KretzOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. HallOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. HennesseeOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. FrenchOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. EngleOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. HiattOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. State v. FrenchOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. JohnstonOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API