Legal Opinion
Kelly v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 21, 1998No. Civ.A. 96-01892 CKKPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
The five individual plaintiffs in this case seek judicial review pursuant to 22 U.S.C. § 4140(a) and 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A) of final decisions from the Foreign Service Grievance Board (“Board”). The Plaintiffs, former Senior Foreign Service Officers who were mandatorily retired from the United States Agency for International Development (“Agency”), argue that the Agency acted arbitrarily and capriciously when it refused to grant them Limited Career Extensions (“LCE”), which would have foreclosed their mandatory retirement in 1994. Pending before…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Appalachian Power Company v. Environmental Protection Agency, Public Service Electric & Gas Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- MD Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- A.L. Pharma, Inc. v. Donna E. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Leonard P. Matlovich v. Secretary of the Air Force and Colonel Alton J. ThogersenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Conversent Communications of Rhode Island, L.L.C.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2001
- Kerr v. U.S. Dep't of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Kerr v. Department of StateDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Rai Care Centers of Maryland I, LLC v. United States Office of Personnel ManagementDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024