Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Yarborough

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 30, 1984No. 0164PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sanders, Chief Judge:

Respondent David Marvin Arnold brought a tort action against appellant Tommy Yarborough. By an exchange of letters the attorneys for these parties agreed to a settlement of the case on behalf of their respective clients. Yarborough then refused to carry out the terms of the settlement and Arnold moved to compel and enforce it. A hearing was held on the motion, at which Arnold introduced into evidence the letters exchanged between the attorneys. Yarborough testified he never authorized his attorney to settle the case on the terms provided by these letters. The trial judge…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Duckworth v. First National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  2. Nelson v. Coleman Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  3. Rosamond Enterprises, Inc. v. McGranahanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  4. Alma Lumber Co. v. BeachamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896
  5. Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Harris-Jenkins v. Nissan Car Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Ashfort Corp. v. Palmetto Construction Group, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Collins Ex Rel. Collins v. Bisson Moving & Storage, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  4. Lites v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  5. Crowley v. Harvey & Battey, P.A.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API