Legal Opinion

Dinkle v. Lagala

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 26, 1998PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Vincent Lagala and Giovanna Fontana appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mastro, J.), dated April 30, 1997, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the appellants’ motion is granted, and the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dunham v. Hilco Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Beckett v. ConteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Philpotts v. PetrovicAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Covington v. CinnirellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. O'Neill v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alexander v. FelagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Hernandez v. LinhartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Cook v. MankowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Dinkle v. LagalaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Joseph v. LayneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API