Legal Opinion

J. A. Sloan & Co. v. Fields

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 10, 1930No. 8 Div. 182PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, O. J.

The claim of exemptions substantially conformed to the requirements of section 7890 of the Code of 3923, and the trial court did not err in refusing to strike same. It described the property, gave the acreage and value, and recited that it was affiant’s “residence and homestead,” and, if it was his residence, this was the equivalent of saying he resided on the land. In the case of Blum v. Carter, 63 Ala. 235, the affidavit does not appear, but the opinion indicates that it possessed several infirmities that do not appear in the present claim.

It may be doubtful as to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hodges v. WinstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  2. Tyler v. JewettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  3. Blum v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  4. Jaffrey & Co. v. McGoughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  5. Dicus v. Hall, Hooper & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  2. In Re HughesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · 2004
  3. Murphy v. VaughanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API