Legal Opinion

Royal Globe Insurance v. Rzhevsky

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided April 28, 1983Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ira B. Harkavy, J.

May an insured who alleges receipt of inadequate compensation from its insurer accept payment from the insurer and simultaneously pursue the tort-feasor for the claimed balance? In a recent decision, in this court, it was held that an implied covenant of good faith supersedes the contractual rights of exclusive subrogation (Faraino v Centennial Ins. Co., 117 Misc 2d 297). In this case, we must decide the recourses available to an insured who alleges lack of good faith on the part of its insurer in the settlement of the claim.

Royal Globe Insurance Company…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Scinta v. KazmierczakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Krause v. American Guarantee & Liability InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1977
  4. Faraino v. Centennial InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API