Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 28, 1973No. 72-437PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

276 So.2d 91 (1973)

Clarence SMITH, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-437.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 28, 1973.

Rehearing Denied April 24, 1973.

F. Malcolm Cunningham, of Cunningham & Cunningham, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Nelson E. Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

WALDEN, Judge.

Based on circumstantial evidence, the defendant was convicted of possession of marijuana and drug paraphernalia. We reverse and remand for a new trial because of the insufficiency of the evidence.

Four…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  2. Frank v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  3. Spataro v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. Lockett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  5. Arant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. BowersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Medlin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  3. Sanders v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. Atkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  5. Greene v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API