Legal Opinion

Kaza v. Gardner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1978Published

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: Defendant’s inspection of the medical and hospital records of the Cleveland Clinic should have been permitted pursuant to CPLR 3121 (see Mendelson v Shein, 58 AD2d 859; Greuling v Breakey, 56 AD2d 540, 542). Plaintiffs may not successfully contend that because they do not intend to have a representative of the Cleveland Clinic testify at the time of the trial, 22 NYCRR 1024.25 forecloses disclosure of these records to defendant (Brooks v Hausauer, 51 AD2d 660). The time for plaintiff Pamela Kaza to furnish the authorization is extended until 20 days after entry of the order to be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Greuling v. BreakeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Brooks v. HausauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Mendelson v. SheinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API