Kaza v. Gardner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: Defendant’s inspection of the medical and hospital records of the Cleveland Clinic should have been permitted pursuant to CPLR 3121 (see Mendelson v Shein, 58 AD2d 859; Greuling v Breakey, 56 AD2d 540, 542). Plaintiffs may not successfully contend that because they do not intend to have a representative of the Cleveland Clinic testify at the time of the trial, 22 NYCRR 1024.25 forecloses disclosure of these records to defendant (Brooks v Hausauer, 51 AD2d 660). The time for plaintiff Pamela Kaza to furnish the authorization is extended until 20 days after entry of the order to be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Greuling v. BreakeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Brooks v. HausauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Mendelson v. SheinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977