Legal Opinion

Means v. State Highway Department

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 17, 1928No. 12451PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Stabler.

Among the routes directed by the Act of 1924 (33 Stat., 1193), known as the "Pay-As-You-Go” Act, to be taken over by the State Highway Department for construction and maintenance, in Greenville County,- is the route, “Prom Pick-ens County line northeasterly on Routes Nos. 2 and 8 by way of Greenville, Taylor and Greer to the Spartanburg County line”; and in Pickens County, “From Greenville County line westerly on Route No. 2 by way of Easley, Liberty, Norris, Central and Calhoun to the Oconee County line.”

In 1927 the Highway…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Santee Mills v. QuerySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  2. Battle v. WillcoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  3. McKiever v. City of SumterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  4. State v. O'DaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
  5. Powell v. HargroveSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Clarke v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  2. State Ex Rel. Richards v. MoorerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  3. State Ex Rel. Coleman v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  4. Scroggie v. Scarborough, State TreasurerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  5. Crawford v. Johnston, GovernorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API