Legal Opinion

Bridwell v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1995No. 49S05-9503-CR-293PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKSON, Justice.

The defendant, Ray Bridwell, was convict, ed on three counts of Child Molesting and appealed, claiming violations of his constitutional rights to speedy trial and right to discharge under Indiana Criminal Rule 4(C). The Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Bridwell v. State (1994), Ind.App., 640 N.E.2d 487. Bridwell's petition to transfer asserts, inter alia, that the decision of the Court of Appeals is inconsistent with Raber v. State (1993), Ind.App., 626 N.E.2d 506.

Indiana Criminal Rule 4 generally implements the constitutional right of a eriminal defendant to a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Raber v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Curtis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Mickey Cundiff v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Truax v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Vaillancourt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API