Bridwell v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DICKSON, Justice.
The defendant, Ray Bridwell, was convict, ed on three counts of Child Molesting and appealed, claiming violations of his constitutional rights to speedy trial and right to discharge under Indiana Criminal Rule 4(C). The Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Bridwell v. State (1994), Ind.App., 640 N.E.2d 487. Bridwell's petition to transfer asserts, inter alia, that the decision of the Court of Appeals is inconsistent with Raber v. State (1993), Ind.App., 626 N.E.2d 506.
Indiana Criminal Rule 4 generally implements the constitutional right of a eriminal defendant to a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Clark v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Raber v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sweeney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Curtis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- Mickey Cundiff v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Truax v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Vaillancourt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.