Legal Opinion
Citron v. Daniell
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 26, 1992No. Nos. 2:91cv00591 (PCD), 2:91cv00689 (PCD)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS
DORSEY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs’ consolidated shareholder derivative actions, on behalf of United Technologies Corporation (“UT”), a nominal defendant, allege that UT’s directors and officers (“defendants”) have fraudulently sought to obtain and retain United States defense contracts.1 Plaintiffs claim defendants violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act of 1970 (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1961, et seq.; Section 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78n(a) and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder;2 and Section 20…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Grobow v. PerotSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- Levine v. SmithSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
- Spiegel v. BuntrockSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Langner v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Matter of Prudential Ins. Co. Litig.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- Coyer v. HemmerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- Kenney v. KoenigDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2006
- Strong ex rel. Tidewater, Inc. v. TaylorDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.