Legal Opinion

Milwaukee Safeguard Insurance v. Selcke

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1997No. 82047PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple

Defendants, the Director of Insurance and the Treasurer of the State of Illinois, contend that the circuit court erred in declaring unconstitutional section 409 of the Illinois Insurance Code (215 ILCS 5/409 (West 1992)), which imposes an annual privilege tax on foreign or alien insurance companies. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the circuit court’s judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiffs are insurance companies doing business in Illinois but incorporated in other states. As foreign companies, plaintiffs are required by section 409 of the Illinois Insurance Code (the Code)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crum & Forster Managers Corp. v. Resolution Trust Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Geja's Cafe v. Metropolitan Pier & Exposition AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Allegro Services, Ltd. v. Metropolitan Pier & Exposition AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Searle Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Arangold Corp. v. ZehnderIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Gore v. Indiana InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  3. Primeco Personal Communications, L.P. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Rockwood Holding Co. v. Department of RevenueAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  5. Moran Transportation Corp. v. StrogerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API