Legal Opinion

Kristin Vanwinkle v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)

Decided October 28, 2010No. 02-09-00200-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-09-00200-CR

KRISTIN VANWINKLE

APPELLANT

V

THE STATE OF TEXAS

STATE

------------

FROM THE 367TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]

------------

In three issues, appellant Kristin Vanwinkle appeals her conviction for obtaining or possessing hydrocodone through the use of a fraudulent prescription.[2] She argues that the trial court erred by excluding evidence that she tested negative for drugs, by denying her discovery of a witness’s fingerprints, and by failing to make a reporter’s record of bench conferences. We…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Motilla v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. Solomon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  5. Walters v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API