Legal Opinion

Indianapolis, Pittsburgh & Cleveland Railroad v. Williams

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1860PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from the Delaware Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtHanna, J.

Complaint, averring that the cars, &c., of appellant, killed a horse of appellee, of the value, &c.

John Davis, for appellant. D. Nation and O. M. Anthony, for appellee.

There is no averment that the road was not fenced, nor of carelessness.

A demurrer was overruled to the complaint. This was error. The Indianapolis and Cincinnati Railroad Co. v. Wharton, 13 Ind. 509.

There was an answer of four paragraphs, one of which averred that the road was fenced, &c. Reply, in denial.

It is now said that the error, in overruling the demurrer, should not reverse the judgment, because the merits were tried…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. WhartonIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Indianapolis, Cincinnati, & Lafayette R. R. v. RobinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis Railroad v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, & St. Louis Railroad v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API