Legal Opinion

Embassy Group, Inc. v. Hatch

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided December 7, 1993No. 920427-CAPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILLINGS, Presiding Judge:

Plaintiff/appellant Embassy Group, Inc. appeals from a judgment denying its claims for breach of contract, fraud, mutual mistake, and unjust enrichment and quieting title to property in defendants/appellees Daryl and Maureen Hatch. We affirm.

FACTS

This dispute centers on the purchase price of Lot 33 of Bridlewood Subdivision in Bountiful, Utah. Embassy argues that the asking price was $99,000, but that its predecessor accepted the Hatches’ offer to purchase Lot 33 for $80,000. Daryl Hatch, on the other hand, contends he agreed to purchase Lot 33 for $40,000.

‘We…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Kimball v. CampbellUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Buehner Block Co. v. UWC ASSOCIATESUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Acton v. DeliranUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Branch v. Western Petroleum, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Davies v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Andalex Resources, Inc. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  2. Maynard v. WhartonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
  3. Sorenson v. Kennecott Utah Copper Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  4. E & H Land, Ltd. v. Farmington CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  5. Schafir v. HarriganCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API