Legal Opinion

Burkholder v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 17, 1972No. 375-901PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.

The State Accident Insurance Fund appeals from an order of the circuit court directing that a hearing be allowed claimant on his claim for a compensable injury. The principal question to be decided is whether the claimant filed a timely request for a hearing by the Workmen’s Compensation Board after the Fund denied his claim for benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. A second issue involves whether the trial court properly awarded attorney fees to claimant’s attorney.

The Fund mailed a notice on December 8, 1969, stating that claimant’s claim was denied. Pursuant to ORS 656.262 (6),…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dimitroff v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Norton v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Peterson v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Hinkle v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Waibel v. State Compensation DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sekermestrovich v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Schneider v. Emanuel HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  3. Wright v. Bekins Moving and Storage Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. Zandbergen v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. Billings v. CrouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API