Legal Opinion

State v. Holmes

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1983No. 47870-8, 48386-8, 48387-6, 48388-4, 48389-2, 48390-6PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDimmick, J.

Appellants were separately charged with theft in violation of the welfare fraud statute, RCW 74.08-.331. In motions to dismiss each appellant argued that RCW 74.08.331 constitutes an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority and is unconstitutionally vague. The motions to dismiss were denied and appellants were found guilty on stipulated facts. We consolidated the direct appeals and now affirm the six trial courts.

Appellants were found guilty on the following facts:

Each appellant applied for and received public assistance benefits under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. DelmarterWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Barry & Barry, Inc. v. Department of Motor VehiclesWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. City of Bellevue v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Polygon Corp. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. O'NEILLWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. BriseboisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  5. State v. HullCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API