People to Save the Sheyenne River, Inc. v. North Dakota Department of Health
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Opponents to the modification of a permit for the Devils Lake outlet (collectively “Manitoba”) appeal from a district court judgment affirming a decision by the North Dakota Department of Health to modify the permit. Manitoba claims the Health Department failed to conduct a required antidegradation review before modifying the permit and there was not “cause” to support the modification. We conclude the Health Department did not act arbitrarily, capriciously, or unreasonably in deciding an antidegradation review was not required to modify the permit and there was cause…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- St. Benedict's Health Center v. North Dakota Department of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- People to Save the Sheyenne River, Inc. v. North Dakota Department of HealthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Calcasieu League for Environmental Action Now v. ThompsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Guyton v. BarrowSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- Industrial Contractors, Inc. v. WORKFORCE SAFETY & INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Ennis v. North Dakota Department of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. MiddletonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Voigt v. North Dakota Public Service CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.