Legal Opinion

Roher v. Dinkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 1, 1972PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York *957County, entered October 20,1972, modified, on the law, to the extent of (a) declaring that section 2590-c (subd. 6, par. [34], el. b) of the Education Law is unconstitutional only insofar as it purports to permit vacancies to be filled for the entire unexpired term of a previously elected community board member, and (b) vacating that portion thereof which declares that the offices presently held by the individual respondents shall be vacant as of January 1, 1973. Except as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People, Ex Rel. Weller v. . TownsendNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Matter of Schwab v. . BoyleNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Schwab v. BoyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  4. Roher v. DinkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. MTR. OF JOSLIN v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. 495 CORP. v. NJ Ins. Underwriting Ass'n.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  3. Loving v. Ponderosa Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Dalton v. PatakiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. Maybee v. State of NYNew York Court of Appeals · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API