Legal Opinion

Brygider v. Atkinson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 3, 1989No. A89A0047Published

1Opinion of the Court

192 Ga. App. 424 (1989)

385 S.E.2d 95

BRYGIDER

v.

ATKINSON.

A89A0047.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided July 3, 1989.

Rehearing Denied July 25, 1989.

King, Morriss, Talansky & Witcher, Joseph H. King, Jr., for appellant.

Tyrus B. Atkinson, Jr., pro se.

BEASLEY, Judge.

Brygider, a former client of attorney Atkinson, appeals the grant of summary judgment to Atkinson in this suit over unpaid attorney fees.

Recovery was sought under three theories, but the motion for summary judgment is based only on Count One, breach of an oral contract.

The controversy for which Atkinson was hired involved a product, a…

Also in this document: Concurrence · McMurray; Concurrence · Carley.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Eiberger v. WestSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Dickson v. DicksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  3. Mitchell v. RaineyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Chapman v. McClellandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  5. Scott v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API