Legal Opinion

Rigney v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 18, 1916PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The action was brought to recover damages resulting to the plaintiffs from changing the grade of Columbia street in the city of Rensselaer, upon which street the lands of the plaintiffs abut.

For a period of thirty-eight years before the change of grade complained of, Columbia street was carried over the defendant's railroad tracks on a bridge, and there was a slight grade or elevation in the street as it approached the railroad bridge in front of the plaintiffs' land, which lies next to the defendant's railroad tracks. The approach to the bridge did not occupy the whole width of the street,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Vrooman v. . TurnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Radcliff's Executors v. . Mayor, C. of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  4. Pond v. . New Rochelle Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Smyth v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Seaver v. . RansomNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. McClare v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. PICCOLI A/S v. Calvin Klein Jeanswear Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  5. Freigy v. Gargaro Company, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1945

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API