Legal Opinion

Citizens' Bank v. Commercial Sav. Bank

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 19, 1923No. 6 Div. 882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

The general rule is well settled that—

“A bank which pays money by mistake on a raised or altered check or draft may recover it back from the person, provided the bank has not been guilty of culpable negligence in making the payment.” 7 Corp. Jur. 691, § 419.

A more precise statement of the law is made by Judge Freeman as follows:

“The bank or drawee is not bound to know the handwriting in the body of the instrument. Where, therefore, money is by mistake paid by a bank upon a raised or altered check, or by a drawee upon a raised or altered draft, neither party being in fault, it may generally be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People's Bank v. Franklin BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Crocker-Woolworth National Bank v. Nevada BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Alabama National Bank v. RiversSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  4. Metropolitan National Bank v. Merchants' National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Birmingham National Bank v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. Federal Reserve BankMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Scott v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API