Legal Opinion

Centennial Bank v. Roddenberry

District Court, N.D. Florida

Decided August 23, 2012No. Case No. 4:11CV369-RH/WCSPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING THE MOTION TO REDUCE THE MARSHAL’S FEE

ROBERT L. HINKLE, District Judge.

This case presents a dispute over the United States Marshal’s fee for conducting a foreclosure sale. The governing statute provides for a fee calculated as a percentage of the amount “collected” from the sale. The issue is this: when the creditor successfully bids a nominal amount from its underlying judgment, so that no funds are actually paid or collected, is the Marshal’s fee a percentage of the nominal amount (as the plaintiff contends) or a *1319percentage of the lesser of the judgment amount and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Gelfert v. National City Bank of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Norwest Bank Owatonna, NA v. MillardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. The Cesare AugustoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1941
  5. Small Business Loan Source, Inc. v. F/V St. Mary II, Official No. 1121027District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2005

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Redus Florida Commercial, LLC v. College Station Retail Center, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  2. Redus Florida Commercial, LLC v. College Station Retail Center, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API