Cullum v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Legge, Justice.
Appellant, a dealer in used automobiles, brought this action for damages in the court of common pleas for Greenwood County, alleging that on March 9, 1953, respondent had maliciously libelled him by composing and publishing in writing concerning him a false and defamatory report in the following words: “Owes heavily on the purchase price. Owes Ouzts $8,000.00 on business.” He alleged that the quoted language meant that he owed a large amount of money on the purchase price of his business, and further owed one Clinton R. Ouzts, of Greenwood, $8,000.00 on his business. As…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Duncan v. the Record Publishing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- Bell v. Bank of AbbevilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
- Fitchette v. Sumter Hardwood Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
- Bell v. Bank of AbbevilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
- Fulton v. Atlantic Coast Line R. CoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- David Weinberger, on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Retail Credit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Jones v. GarnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
- Abofreka v. Alston Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
- Weir v. Citicorp National Services, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.