Legal Opinion

Cottrell v. Wheeler

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 19, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Judgment: assignment : evidence. Appeal from Cedar District Cowrt. — Hon. J. H. Preston, Judge. Summary proceeding for judgment against the defendants. Judgment rendered for the intervenors, from which the plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.

This is a summary proceeding for judgment against the defendants, who are practicing lawyers of Tipton, Iowa, for one thousand, three hundred and seventy-seven, dollars, which it is alleged they have collected upon a judgment belonging to the plaintiffs, and refuse to pay over. The facts, as disclosed by the pleadings and on the hearing, are that on March 26, 1878, Piatt & Carr and I. M. Preston, as attorneys, procured a judgment for five thousand dollars against one Mink, and in favor of Maria D. Shaffer; that the firm of Piatt & Carr, composed of H. C. Piatt and H. C. Carr, were practicing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harbach v. ColvinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  2. Bigler v. ToySupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  3. Davenport Savings Fund & Loan Ass'n v. North American Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  4. Maxwell v. La BruneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  5. Watkins & Williams v. SwiggettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ritz v. ReaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  2. Howard v. KellySupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API