Legal Opinion

Refreshment Services Co. v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1980No. Nos. 79-630 and 79-716PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

I

The fundamental issue presented by case No. 79-630 is whether the city of Cleveland terminated its concession contract with Refreshment Services in accordance with the termination procedure set forth in that agreement. Article XXVIII of the contract provides that the “city shall have the right to terminate this concession agreement at any time on thirty (30) days written notice to concessionaire if and when by resolution of the board of control the city determines such termination is in the public interest.”

It was the Court of Appeals’ conclusion that the city’s termination of the contract…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wheeling Steel Corp. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Bloch v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  3. City of Cincinnati v. WegehoftOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  4. State Ex Rel. Christman v. SkinnerOhio Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Daniel E. Terreri & Sons, Inc. v. Mahoning County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Klesch v. ReidOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Stroh v. Town of JavaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State ex rel. Staffrey v. D'ApolitoOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Estate of Brummitt v. Ohio Mut. Ins. GroupOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API