Legal Opinion
People v. Kirk
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 21, 1974No. Crim. 12248PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELKINGTON, J.
On a jury’s verdicts defendant Kirk was found guilty of grand theft (Pen. Code, § § 484, 487) from the Bank of America, and of four interrelated offenses against the Vigilant Insurance Company, i.e., grand theft, presentation of a false insurance claim (Ins. Code, § 556), willfully secreting property with intent to defraud its insurer (Pen. Code, § 548), and falsely reporting a felony (Pen. Code, § 148.5). He has appealed from an order thereafter placing him on probation for those offenses.
Excluding all that claimed by Kirk to be tainted with error, the evidence of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- People v. CahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. FauberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. WashCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. HustonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Clyburn v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.