Krovitch v. Stull

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

Appellant-plaintiff Michael Krovitch appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion contesting the adoption of his biological daughter, A.M. Specifically, Krovitch claims that the evidence was insufficient to dispense with his purported required consent to the adoption, that the trial court erred in terminating his representation by court-appointed counsel, and that the trial court erroneously ordered him to reimburse the County for attorney fees.

FACTS

The facts most favorable to the judgment reveal that A.M. was born on December 28, 1995 to Colleen Hardesty, a single…