Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. C.C.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 24, 1983No. Nos. 81-2564, 82-666, 82-797 and 82-1825Published

1ConcurrenceSchwartz, Chief Judge

(specially concurring).

I concur with the court that there is no jurisdiction to consider state appeals in juvenile cases either from adverse final judgments or interlocutory orders. I wish, however, to add a few observations on each of these two separate but interrelated subjects.

As I see it, the basic flaw in the reasoning and holding of State v. W.A.M., 412 So.2d 49 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982), rev. denied, 419 So.2d 1201 (Fla.1982) is that it fails to recognize that, arguably unlike the rule in civil cases,1 Article V, Section 4(b) of the *281Constitution grants no right to the state, or the attorney…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Jacksonville, Tampa & Key West Railway Co. v. BoySupreme Court of Florida · 1894
  3. State v. SteinbrecherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. State v. W. A. M.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API