Legal Opinion
United States of America Ex Rel. Herbert Brothers, H-6564 v. Alfred T. Rundle, Superintendent
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 22, 1969No. 17652_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Relator appeals from a September 10, 1968, order of the District Court denying a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Following his conviction by a jury of (1) corrupting the morals of a nine-year old minor, (2) assault and battery, (3) assault with intent to commit sodomy, and (4) sodomy (N. T. 613-14), after a five-day trial relator’s post-trial motions were denied by an order supported by a December 11, 1967 opinion of the state trial court and his appeal to the Pennsylvania Superior Court resulted in affirmance of his conviction per curiam. Commonwealth v. Brothers,…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. John Fioravanti, Nicholas Panaccione, and Angelo Pepe, Nicholas PanaccioneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Kawakita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- William T. Fulwood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Tomoya Kawakita v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- United States v. Vincent John RaoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Armstrong v. DuggerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Armstrong v. DuggerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Graham v. HarrisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- United States ex rel. Barbry v. RundleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970