Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Mather-James Co., Inc. v. Wilson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 6, 1934No. 13825Published

1Concurrence

Mr. Chiee Justice Beease

(concurring in result) : My views, as to the questions involved in this appeal have been fully expressed in my opinion in the case of Fidelity Trust & Mortgage Company v. Davis, 158 S. C., 400, 155 S. E., 622, which was concurred in by all the Justices who participated in the decision, in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Bonham, and my opinion, concurring in that opinion, in the case of U. S. Hoffman Machinery Corporation v. Harris, 167 S. C., 443, 166 S. E., 613. Those views are not in accord with the holdings of Mr. Justice Stabler in this case.

The decision in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HanahanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  2. Simpson v. McDonaldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  3. United States Hoffman MacHinery Corp. v. HarrisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. AndersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API