Legal Opinion

Sallis v. Lamansky

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 16, 1988No. 86-1079PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHULTZ, Justice.

This appeal is from a $626,000 judgment entered in favor of plaintiff-appellee Daniel Sallis in a personal injury action. Sallis suffered a cervical hyperextension, commonly known as “whiplash,” when his pickup was rear-ended by a vehicle driven by Helen Lamansky and owned by the Sisters of Mercy of the Union in the United States of America, Province of Chicago. This action was brought against Lamansky and the Sisters of Mercy by Sallis individually and on behalf of his children. The children were not awarded damages at trial and their claims for consortium are not involved…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. MyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  2. Harsha v. State Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  3. DeBurkarte v. LouvarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  4. Haumersen v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  5. Ferris v. RileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Spaur v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  2. Revere Transducers, Inc. v. Deere & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  3. Rees v. O'MALLEYSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  4. Vasconez v. MillsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  5. Schonberger v. RobertsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API