Legal Opinion

Mander v. Concreform Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 7, 1968No. 67-309PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIERCE, Judge.

This is an appeal from a Circuit Court order granting a motion to dismiss a peti*663tion, filed by an original successful claimant before Florida Industrial Commission, to secure payment of interest on his attorney’s fees theretofore allowed, during the time the attorney was successfully defending appeals from the Deputy Commissioner’s compensation award to the Full Commission and thence to the Supreme Court.

Petitioner Albert J. Mander made claim before the Commission for workmen’s compensation benefits and in due course the Deputy Commissioner awarded temporary total disability…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Codomo v. EmanuelSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  2. Dorner v. Red Top Cab & Baggage Co. Ex Rel. FontaineSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
  3. Great American Indemnity Company v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  4. Larson v. WarrenSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  5. Coggan v. CogganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mander v. Concreform Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1968
  2. Peeno v. Peeno, Circuit Court of the 5th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Lake County1968
  3. Preble v. Board of TrusteesHawaii Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API