Legal Opinion

New Phila. L. Assn. v. Druian Et Ux.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1930No. Appeal 153PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

On March 27,1928, plaintiff, engaged in the business of making loans, entered a judgment in the court below upon a note for $500, signed by defendants, who are husband and wife; it was dated March 24, 1928, contained a warrant of attorney to confess judgment and was given to secure the repayment, in instalments, of a loan.

Fanny Druian, alleging that she signed the note “as surety for her husband,” filed her petition to open the judgment as to her; plaintiff answered, denying that she signed as surety for her husband and averring that the loan had been made to her.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bank v. FulmorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Charles D. Kaier Co. v. O'brienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Yeany, ex rel. Gold Standard National Bank v. ShannonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  4. Reidlinger v. CameronSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Fannie Saslow v. SaslowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Western National Bank v. LevinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Hastings Bank of Hastings v. CovitchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Cooper v. Lucas Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Gordon v. Miller, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API