HARVEY v. the STATE.

Bethel, Judge.

*7 Christopher David Harvey appeals the denial of his motion for a new trial, *305 arguing that the trial court erred in several respects. *8 Harvey argues that the trial court should have sustained his objection that the police sergeant who testified regarding items found on Harvey's person lacked personal knowledge. Accordingly, he contends that the admission of those items into evidence was error. Harvey further argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions for possession of marijuana, possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, and possession of…