Legal Opinion

DeGraf v. Seattle & Tacoma Navigation Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1895No. 1381PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries. At the close of the plaintiff’s testimony the defendants moved for a non-suit, which the court granted. Whereupon the plaintiff appealed. The respondent moves to dismiss on the ground that there has been no final judgment in the case. The order granting the motion is as follows:

“Thereupon [referring to the closing of the testimony in chief], defendants’ attorney moved the court for an order of non-suit, which motion is granted upon due consideration thereof, and the cause is ordered'…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Taylor v. Kitsap County Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Wooddy v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Bales v. BromeWyoming Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Goldring v. ReidSupreme Court of Florida · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API