Legal Opinion

In re Solomon

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 31, 1941No. 13753PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KALODNER, District Judge.

The facts in this case are stated clearly and succinctly by the referee in his opinion as follows:

“While one Anthony Narkiewicz and Waleryz Narkiewicz, his wife, owned title to premises 2052 Fairmount Avenue, Philadelphia, Pa., as tenants by the entireties, the husband, without the joinder of his wife, gave to the petitioner’s assignor his bond for $10,000 and a mortgage, purporting to secure the loan by a first lien upon the said premises. At the same time the husband, again alone, gave his bond for $6,000 and executed what purported to be a second mortgage on the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. York Manufacturing Co. v. CassellSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Hewit v. Berlin MacHine WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. De Wolf v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  4. Zartman v. First Nat. Bank of WaterlooSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Freeman v. . AuldNew York Court of Appeals · 1870

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Peoples Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Myrtle Beach Golf & Yacht ClubCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Shedden, L., Aplts. v. Anadarko E&P Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Webb v. First Mutual Corp. (In Re Webb)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. In Re Magnus Harmonica CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1958
  5. Shell Oil Co. v. Trailer & Truck Repair Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API