Legal Opinion

Magee v. Winn

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1932No. 5892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEE, C. J. —

Plaintiff and appellant, Magee, a physician and surgeon, sued two sisters, Inez and Nita Winn, for professional and hospital fees consequent upon an operation involving Nita Winn. Paragraph 3 of the complaint charged: “That he found the said Nita Winn in a very-dangerous condition which necessitated an immediate operation to save her life and that at the solicitation and request of the defendant, Inez L. Winn, he took the said Nita Winn to his hospital in Moscow, Idaho, such hospital being called the Inland Hospital.” A general as well as a special demurrer upon the ground of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bevercombe v. Denney & Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Swarens v. PfniselSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  3. Storer v. HeitfeldIdaho Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mickelsen Construction, Inc. v. HorrocksIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Slusser v. AumockIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Mickelsen Construction, Inc. v. HorrocksIdaho Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API