Legal Opinion

Schmeling v. Schmeling

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 26, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Onondaga County Family Court for further proceedings, and stay continued, in accordance with the following Memorandum: The Family Court and the Hearing Examiner erred in admitting two unsworn letters into evidence in support of petitioner’s request for an upward modification of support. A hearing to determine a request for modification of a support order is governed by the rules of evidence (Family Ct Act § 439 [d]); thus, unsworn testimony is inadmissible (see, Richardson, Evidence § 388 [Prince 10th ed]).…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eason v. EasonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Nowacki v. NowackiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Pringle v. PringleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Livingston County Department of Social Services ex rel. Linsner v. GrimmeltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Vizcaino v. ButlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API