Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. City of Dallas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 14, 1937No. 13676PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

The contention is made by the City of Dallas that this cause has become moot and prayer is for a dismissal of the writ of error sued out by George M. Hopkins, plaintiff in• .error.

This is a condemnation suit whereby defendant in error City of Dallas sought to condemn certain lands alleged to be owned by George M. Hopkins and his wife, Eleanor F. Hopkins, in which a number of other persons were named as defendants who are alleged to be asserting “certain liens, claims or property rights and interest in and to the said real estate.” Among these persons the petition names George…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Padgitt v. Young CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. City of Mesquite v. RawlinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  3. Harrell v. City of DentonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Roadrunner Investments, Inc. v. Texas Utilities Fuel Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Parr v. First State Bank of San DiegoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API