Legal Opinion

Jose Acosta v. J & T Junction Corp dba Kingsburg Sinclair aka J & T Junction

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 4, 2026No. 1:24-cv-01436Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JOSE ACOSTA, Case No. 1:24-cv-01436-EGC 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT 12 v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 13 (Doc. 16) 14 J & T JUNCTION CORP dba KINGSBURG SINCLAIR aka J & T JUNCTION, 21-DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendant. Clerk to Assign a District Judge 16 _________________________________ _ / 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 On August 19, 2026, Plaintiff Jose Acosta (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion for default judgment 20 against Defendant J & T Junction Corp, doing business as Kingsburg Sinclair,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API