Legal Opinion

Garratt v. Dailey

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1956No. 33663PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

This is an action for damages resulting from an alleged battery perpetrated upon the plaintiff by the defendant, who was five years and nine months of age at the time of the occurrence. The judgment of the superior court of Pierce county in favor of the defendant, was reviewed by this court in Garratt v. Dailey, 46 Wn. (2d) 197, 279 P. (2d) 1091. Reference is hereby made to that opinion for the material facts found by the trial court and the applicable law, as enunciated by this court.

Upon remand for clarification on the issue of the defendant’s knowledge, the superior court reviewed the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tucker v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Garratt v. DaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Frye v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Caudle v. BettsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  2. Mathias v. Accor Economy Lodging, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Ghassemieh v. SchaferCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  4. Harp v. American Surety Co. of New YorkWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Williams v. Leone & Keeble, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API