Legal Opinion

City of Milwaukee v. Pontell

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1971No. 41PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

The issue is whether a tort claim for specific amount of money for property damage based upon negligence is discharged in bankruptcy when no action is pending therefor at the time the petition in bankruptcy is filed. The defendant contends the claim was “fixed” because it was set forth in a dollar amount and therefore was discharged in bankruptcy as a provable claim. We think not.

Not all claims are discharged in bankruptcy. With six exceptions not relevant here, a discharge in bankruptcy by sec. 17 of the Bankruptcy Act releases a bankrupt only from his provable debts. Nonprovable debts and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crawford v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Dunbar v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Schall v. CamorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Poznanovic v. GilardineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  5. Smith v. McQuillinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. KnopsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API