Legal Opinion

In Re Geico Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 17, 2010No. 1091420PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYONS, Justice.

Geico Casualty Company (“Geico”), one of the defendants in an action arising out of a vehicular accident, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus requesting that this Court direct the trial court to vacate its order granting the plaintiffs motion to set aside a previous order that granted Geico’s motion to “opt out” of these proceedings. We grant the petition and issue the writ.

I. Factual Background and Procedural History

On December 24, 2007, a vehicle driven by Aundrea Pritchett was involved in an accident with a vehicle driven by Clifford Paparella. On August 29, 2008,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Integon Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  2. Ex Parte EdgarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Ex Parte Perfection Siding, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. Lowe v. Nationwide Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex parte Electric Insurance Company.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2014
  2. Zajic v. Payne (Ex parte Allstate Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  3. Sullins v. MorelandDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2021
  4. Trotter v. Alfa Mutual General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API