Legal Opinion

Gill v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 4, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Criminal law. Liquor. Minors. Parent and child. Before Judge Smith. Muscogee superior court. May term, 1890. Indictment for selling liquor to a minor without written authority first obtained, and in a second count for permitting the same to be done by a clerk in his employ.

Read the full summary

Criminal law. Liquor. Minors. Parent and child. Before Judge Smith. Muscogee superior court. May term, 1890. Indictment for selling liquor to a minor without written authority first obtained, and in a second count for permitting the same to be done by a clerk in his employ. The defendant admitted that he sold liquor to the minor only after the 1st of February, 1889. There was no evidence that he sold any before that date, the testimony for the State being that the minor drank liquor in the bar-room of which the defendant was one of the proprietors, several times during 1889 — once during the…

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Chief Justice.

The indictment was under section 4540(a) of the code, which reads as follows : “No person or persons, by himself or another, shall sell, or cause to be sold, or furnished, or permit any other person, or persons, in his, her, or their employ, to sell, or furnish any minor or minors, spirituous or intoxicating, or malt liquors of any kind, without first obtaining written authority from the parent or guardian of such minor, or minors, and such person, or persons, so offending shall, on conviction, be punished as prescribed in section 4310 of the code.” This statute is a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reinhart v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
  2. Mascowitz v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Creech v. . WilderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Supernant v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API