Dobbins v. Pyrolusite Manganese Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Pleadings. Evidence. Contracts. Corporations. Admissions. Before. Judge Hammond. Bartow Superior Court. July Term, 1885. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Blandeord, Justice.
Dobbins sued out an attachment against defendant upon an account. The declaration declared on an account^ which was “ for royalty on manganese ore.”
*451On the trial, Dobbins testified that the account was correct, and that Woodward, the president of the company, promised to pay it. Stansell also testified that Woodward, the president of the company, after the suit was commenced, promised to pay the account. Woodward, as president, appeared for the company, and pleaded the general issue.
It was shown that there was a contract in writing between plaintiff and defendant as to the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hancock v. RossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
3Cited by12 opinions
- Potts-Thompson Liquor Co. v. PottsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Sizer & Co. v. Melton & SonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Tifton, Thomasville & Gulf Railway Co. v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Baker v. Lowe Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Tumlin v. Bass Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1894
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.