Lake v. Doud
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHitchcock, J.
This is a bill in chancery from the county of Trumbull,
It is submitted to the court upon bill, answers, exhibits, and testimony, and presents merely questions of fact. '
The caso was fully argued by Newton, Birchard, Tod and Hoffman, for the complainant, and by Webb and Crowle, for the defendants.
On the part of the defendants several points of law were raised, but as in the view taken by the court of the case these points were not necessarily involved, they are not here stated.
It is stated in the bill in this case that on May 15, 1835, the de*416fendant Remmington executed to the complainant a…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Klonowski v. MonczewskiOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Opinion No. (1996), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1996