Legal Opinion

State v. Wardrip

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 7, 1981No. 80-6692-C, CA A20696PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction in a trial to the court for driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 487.540, contending the trial court erred in refusing to hear the testimony of a polygraph operator and in permitting the state to offer evidence that he refused a breath test. We affirm.

Defendant and the prosecutor agreed defendant would take a polygraph test prior to trial on the issue of whether he was driving. The written agreement, signed by the prosecutor, defendant and defense counsel, provided in part:

“* * * [T]he opinion of the examiner and his written report thereof…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. SheehanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API