Legal Opinion

Duggar v. Mobile & Gulf Nav. Co.

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1931No. 1 Div. 2PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

The following statement of the facts is disclosed by the record:

The original appellant plaintiff, L. L. Dug-gar, now deceased, brought suit against P. M. Tindel, defendant, in the circuit court of Mobile county, Ala., on October 14, 1929.

A writ of garnishment was subsequently sued out, with bond, the writ being served on appellee garnishee on October 29, 1929, and the defendant, P. M. Tindel, served with notice thereof.

The answer of the appellee garnishee set up that the defendant, P. M. Tindel, was, at the time of the service of the writ of garnishment on it, in its employ as a pilot or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McDonald v. HoveySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Duramus v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  3. United States v. THE" GRACE LOTHROP"Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Inter-Island Steam Navigation Co. v. ByrneSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Waterman S. S. Corporation v. BrillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. Gordon v. BlacktonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  3. X-L Finance Co. v. BonvillionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  4. Bloomingdale Bros. v. ButlerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1934
  5. Waterman S.S. Corporation v. BrillAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API