T. J. Boyd & Co. v. Pottle

The plaintiff sued the defendant, Pottle, by attachment. The writ was levied upon a lot of household goods. The respondent filed an inter-plea, claiming the goods. The issues were found for him both before the justice and in the circuit court, and the plaintiff, by successive appeals, has brought the matter here for review. The complaint here is that, under the conceded facts, the judgment on the interplea ought to have been for the plaintiff.

The respondent claims to have purchased the goods from Pottle on the fourth day of October, 1894, whicn purchase was evidenced by a bill of sale, of…